Romanticism and Experimentalism
I believe in “romantic love.” Even if you take the Song of
Songs as allegory, you have to acknowledge that the allegory works only if
there is a reality of strong emotional-physical attraction-attachment between a
man and a woman. Love is not just commitment and action. Love is desire and
feeling.
This kind of love is obsessive and intense. One’s whole life
is taken up with the object of affection. You think about her/him all the time.
The hours apart are filled with longing. The hours together are prolonged to
the limit. All this is natural and good.
But observation teaches us that this kind of consuming
feeling and desire is manifested with unbroken intensity in the earlier stages
of the relationship. It is most often associated with young love, but new older
lovers experience it, too. The intensity is not sustainable 24-7 (speaking
literally) throughout the relationship’s day (speaking non-literally as this
day can be 50 years or more). We are not able, nor would it be healthy, to live
this kind of “distracted life” on a continuing basis. We have to earn livings, feed
and change babies, sleep and eat, clean the house and mow the lawn.
That does not mean that the flame of Song of Solomon love is
entirely quenched by the many waters of time. But the fire flames up now from
time to time, rather than continually. The intensity of feeling and desire is
experienced less frequently and often when least expected. Such experiences can
be given space to occur and even helped along, as some couples do by “date
nights” or “romantic getaways.”
But romantic feelings cannot be counted on, nor can they be
relied on, to maintain a relationship day to day, week to week, over a
lifetime. Over time the early relationship intensity decreases while the
intertwining of two lives increases. She may not meet you at the door in a
negligee but she will be beside your hospital bed. He may not bring you
flowers, but he will get up with the sick baby so you can get some sleep. It is amidst the realities of life that is often maddeningly boring, sometimes
crushingly tragic, and constantly requiring of forgiveness and tolerance that
proof is given that love really is strong as death.
It should be acknowledged that some profess to experience an
abiding intensity of passionate love. Those whose experience is more mundane
should not greet such professions with skepticism and/or cynicism. Nor should
passionate lovers judge more mundane lovers as possessing a less authentic or
genuine love. There are varieties of romantic experience.
It strikes me that there are similarities between romantic
love and what is sometimes called “experimental” spirituality. “Experimental”
spirituality inquires about the fervency, intensity, and constancy of one’s
feelings. Do you desire God? How much? It
assumes intense feelings are usual and sustainable, if one seeks to keep the
flame alive.
Sometimes this is expressed crudely. Real Clear Religion recently
linked to an article in which Christians are warned not to expect people to
“make out with God” too soon. Offensive as that is, I am not sure it is that
far from a more Reformed in origin story of a meeting where spouses were asked
to share what they most admired about their mates, and a minister’s wife was
quoted approvingly as saying her husband was “hot for God” which I guess is a
variation on the old evangelical being “on fire for the Lord.” But the language
can be less flamboyant while the quest is the same. "I love the Lord" (Psalm 116:1) cannot be translated as "I 'heart' the Lord. "
None of this is meant to deny the place of feelings in religion
any more than in marriage. It is rather to call to put feelings in their place,
to have realistic expectations about and of them, and to allow for variations
of experience of feeling among God’s people and within them. All God’st people
have experiences, but not all of them are of the experimentalist variety.
Judging one’s spiritual health by the degree of one’s spiritual
fever and fervor is akin to judging the state of one’s marriage by how hot one’s
burning and passion.
"We been talkin' 'bout Jackson ever since the fire went out."
2 comments:
Very enjoyable.
It's weird about the incident you mentioned mixing romantic (sexual?) love with non-spouse persons like God ("hot for God" - in heat? For cryin' out loud).
I remember when my daughter was 13 and I was advised to "date her." I think it was meant that I should "take her out" in order to show her I approved of her and all that so that she wouldn't date a sailor when she was 15 or some such stuff.
Yuck!
Very enjoyable.
It's weird about the incident you mentioned mixing romantic (sexual?) love with non-spouse persons like God ("hot for God" - in heat? For cryin' out loud).
I remember when my daughter was 13 and I was advised to "date her." I think it was meant that I should "take her out" in order to show her I approved of her and all that so that she wouldn't date a sailor when she was 15 or some such stuff.
Yuck!
Post a Comment