A Few Comments on Stellman
When
Malcolm Muggeridge converted to Roman Catholicism, he described it as a
decision to go all the way. I have to acknowledge that this is not what “going
all they way” meant back in my day when not everybody who said they did did. But, I think Muggeridge meant going all the way back to what he believed to be
historic Christianity and all the way over to what he saw as its oldest
continuing expression. Others describe the same decision as “crossing the Tiber .”
This
week many are in quite a dither about the decision of Jason Stellman to leave
the PCA and possibly to take the Roman road. I do not know Mr. Stellman
except as the man who took on the thankless and ultimately futile task of
prosecuting Peter Leithhart, a case I followed though not closely. I may have read
one or two of his blogs. Otherwise, I couldn’t tell you anything about him.
A
few observations:
(1)
Carl
Trueman has blogged saying this could have been seen to be coming and that it
is attributable to Stellman’s riding the hobby horses of high view of the
visible church and Two Kingdoms theology. Almost everyone who writes has his
hobby horses, or themes to which he often returns. It might be the necessity of
the new birth, the danger of nominalism, the need for revival, the critical
importance of young earth 6-24 creationism, or the problem of celebrity
pastors. But we should be charitable in the way we view such emphases. I think
most of us have ideas about the challenges, dangers, needs, and opportunities
before the church today. My view is that we need more emphasis that the visible
church “is the kingdom of our Lord Jesus Christ, the house and family of God,
out of which there is no ordinary possibility of salvation” and that “unto this
catholic visible church Christ hath given the ministry, oracles, and ordinances
of God for the gathering and perfecting of the saints” (WCF XXV: 1, 2). Yes,
that is a high ecclesiology and 2K theology. But, if others have different
concerns they wish to emphasize, they have perfect freedom so to do. Just do not try to peer into my psyche if you’d don’t like mine.
(2)
I
have read handwringing about the levels of distress and sense of betrayal that
must be felt by Mr. Stellman’s congregation and his fellow presbyters.
Distress, yes. Betrayal, I’m not so sure. It seems to me that the brother did
not play the hypocrite. When he came to his conclusions, he showed integrity
and courage. I honor this. Would that such honesty characterized more of us ministers. And,
perhaps there is a little understanding and empathy due the man and his family.
(I have seen a little of such concern.) I, for one, do not feel outrage toward
the man. I’m not sure others should, at least not right now.
(3)
I
could have missed it, but, while I have read criticisms of Rome and of Stellman,
I have not read any self-criticism of evangelical Protestantism in general and
its conservative Reformed expression in particular. This is not a new thing
with me. Back in 1991 I served on a
committee of Potomac Presbytery that had to address and make recommendations to
Presbytery concerning what to do about the case of man who “crossed over.” I
noted then in a statement concurring with the report of the committee, problems
with worship, unity, and historical continuity attaching to Protestantism. Further,
I have noted many times that we got rid of the one Pope and got in the exchange
millions of them, every evangelical with his Bible and inner illumination of
the Spirit. It is small wonder that some feel the tug toward Rome despite its history and present
condition. We’ve got problems, serious ones arising from our own history and
practice.
(4)
It
seems that Mr. Stellman’s evolving view is that our acceptance with God depends
not on an imputed righteousness alone but on an imparted, transformational righteousness.
I can only say I hope he is wrong, because there is no way I am going to heaven
if my going depends on anything at all other than the righteousness of Christ.
(5)
One
final thing, and I say it with some trepidation: I am not so sure as some and
as I used to be that those who go over to Rome
are without salvation. I say that not having a clue how one gets past issues
with the mass, Mary, the saints, and Lourdes .
Not
to worry. I am not planning to go all the way.
No comments:
Post a Comment